Jurisdiction:

Idaho

Idaho Legislation

Year of last legislative change: Awaiting dataYear of last legislative change:
Year of last revision to administrative code: Awaiting dataYear of last revision to administrative code:
Most challenging aspects associated with introducing and passing interlock legislation:
Legislation is ambiguous and unclear
Changes for program improvement being pursued: Awaiting dataChanges for program improvement being pursued:
Who is eligible for an interlock in your state according to legislation (Data provided by CIIM):
All impaired drivers
Can impaired drivers 'wait out' their interlock requirement:
Yes
Is an interlock required on test refusal:
Yes

Program Authority

Type of program: Judicial
Agency/agencies with authority over the interlock program:
Department of Motor Vehicles, Office of Highway Safety
Agency/agencies with authority over participant monitoring:
None
Agency/agencies with authority over sanctioning interlock program participants:
Courts, Probation
Agency/agencies with authority to approve devices:
Courts, Probation
Training available for judges, law enforcement, and lawyers: Awaiting dataTraining available for judges, law enforcement, and lawyers:

Program Features

Hardship license available to first offenders: Yes
Hardship license available to repeat offenders: No
Hardship license (First offenders, Repeat offenders, All): First offenders
Lookback period: 10 years
Source of funding: Awaiting dataSource of funding:
Indigent funding is available to participants: Yes
Qualification requirements for indigent funding: Determined by the court
Frequency of interlock device service: Awaiting dataFrequency of interlock device service:

Participation

Participation Rate: Awaiting dataParticipation Rate:
Number of interlock program participants in 2019: Awaiting dataNumber of interlock program participants in 2019:
Indicator used to determine the number of participants in the interlock program (e.g., certificate of device installation, certificate of device removal):
Court orders
Indicator(s) used in state as the best measure(s) of the eligible population of offenders for the interlock program to determine the program participation rate:
Number of court/probation orders for interlock
Penalties for non-compliance: Awaiting dataPenalties for non-compliance:

Program Length

Length of Hard Suspension

1st offenders: 12 months
2nd offenders: 12 months
3rd offenders: 60 months
4th and subsequent offenders: Awaiting data4th and subsequent offenders:

Interlock Program Length

1st offenders: 12 months
2nd offenders: 12 months
3rd offenders: 12 - 60 months
4th and subsequent offenders: Awaiting data4th and subsequent offenders:

Compliance/Non-Compliance

Program length is extended for non-compliance: No
Length of extension for non-compliance: Awaiting dataLength of extension for non-compliance:
Program length is reduced for compliance: No
Length of reduction for compliance: Awaiting dataLength of reduction for compliance:
Frequency of sanctions imposed for non-compliance: Rarely
Program exit requirements: Awaiting dataProgram exit requirements:

Treatment

Treatment is required for the interlock program: Case-by-case basis
Components applied to treatment: Case-by-case basis

Data Collection & Management

Agency responsible for collecting data: Courts
Overview of Data Management: Awaiting dataOverview of Data Management:
Barriers to data collection: Awaiting dataBarriers to data collection:
0
Vendors in State

Vendor Oversight

Number of Vendors in State: 9
Agency responsible for vendor oversight: Awaiting dataAgency responsible for vendor oversight:
Approval process for new vendors: Awaiting dataApproval process for new vendors:
Vendor recertification: Awaiting dataVendor recertification:
Interlock technology features (Data provided by CIIM): Camera
Radius requirement for service centers: None
Radius requirement: Awaiting dataRadius requirement: