Idaho

Idaho Legislation

Year of last legislative change: Awaiting dataYear of last legislative change:

Year of last revision to administrative code: Awaiting dataYear of last revision to administrative code:

Most challenging aspects associated with introducing and passing interlock legislation:
Legislation is ambiguous and unclear

Changes for program improvement being pursued: Awaiting dataChanges for program improvement being pursued:

Who is eligible for an interlock in your state according to legislation (Data provided by CIIM):
All impaired drivers

Can impaired drivers 'wait out' their interlock requirement:
Yes

Is an interlock required on test refusal:
Yes

Program Authority

Type of program: Judicial

Agency/agencies with authority over the interlock program:
Department of Motor Vehicles, Office of Highway Safety

Agency/agencies with authority over participant monitoring:
None

Agency/agencies with authority over sanctioning interlock program participants:
Courts, Probation

Agency/agencies with authority to approve devices:
Courts, Probation

Training available for judges, law enforcement, and lawyers: Awaiting dataTraining available for judges, law enforcement, and lawyers:

Program Features

Hardship license available to first offenders: Yes

Hardship license available to repeat offenders: No

Hardship license (First offenders, Repeat offenders, All): First offenders

Lookback period: 10 years

Source of funding: Awaiting dataSource of funding:

Indigent funding is available to participants: Yes

Qualification requirements for indigent funding: Determined by the court

Frequency of interlock device service: Awaiting dataFrequency of interlock device service:

Participation

Participation Rate: Awaiting dataParticipation Rate:

Number of interlock program participants in 2019: Awaiting dataNumber of interlock program participants in 2019:

Indicator used to determine the number of participants in the interlock program (e.g., certificate of device installation, certificate of device removal):
Court orders

Indicator(s) used in state as the best measure(s) of the eligible population of offenders for the interlock program to determine the program participation rate:
Number of court/probation orders for interlock

Penalties for non-compliance: Awaiting dataPenalties for non-compliance:

Program Length

Length of Hard Suspension

1st offenders: 12 months

2nd offenders: 12 months

3rd offenders: 60 months

4th and subsequent offenders: Awaiting data4th and subsequent offenders:

Interlock Program Length

1st offenders: 12 months

2nd offenders: 12 months

3rd offenders: 12 - 60 months

4th and subsequent offenders: Awaiting data4th and subsequent offenders:

Compliance/Non-Compliance

Program length is extended for non-compliance: No

Length of extension for non-compliance: Awaiting dataLength of extension for non-compliance:

Program length is reduced for compliance: No

Length of reduction for compliance: Awaiting dataLength of reduction for compliance:

Frequency of sanctions imposed for non-compliance: Rarely

Program exit requirements: Awaiting dataProgram exit requirements:

Treatment

Treatment is required for the interlock program: Case-by-case basis

Components applied to treatment: Case-by-case basis

Data Collection & Management

Agency responsible for collecting data: Courts

Overview of Data Management: Awaiting dataOverview of Data Management:

Barriers to data collection: Awaiting dataBarriers to data collection:

Vendors in State

Vendor Oversight

Number of Vendors in State: 9

Agency responsible for vendor oversight: Awaiting dataAgency responsible for vendor oversight:

Approval process for new vendors: Awaiting dataApproval process for new vendors:

Vendor recertification: Awaiting dataVendor recertification:

Interlock technology features (Data provided by CIIM): Camera

Radius requirement for service centers: None

Radius requirement: Awaiting dataRadius requirement:

Jurisdiction: